Prosecutor Refuses to Put Mentally Ill Man on Trial

“Trying the case wasn’t the proper thing to do. I couldn’t ethically prosecute the case,” he said.

Mentally Ill Defendant Puts State In a Bind

What followed the prosecutor’s ethical decision not to prosecute illustrates why states need to examine the intersection of the Olmstead Ruling and Criminal Justice (There is commentary on this issue on the Advocate’s Workshop page.)  States also need to develop laws and procedures for the proper disposition and long-term case management of NGRI acquittees.  States should not deal with NGRI as if it is like any other verdict.  The law needs to remember the context that gives rise to NGRI in the first place.  The absence of rational disposition policies and procedures in the linked-to article contributed to the controversial actions of the District Attorney, Prosecutor, and Judge.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s